mirror of
https://github.com/RPCS3/rpcs3.git
synced 2025-04-28 13:28:01 +03:00
Remove safe_reader_lock, safe_writer_lock
It worked as a simple recursive locker for shared_mutex But its design is flawed and thus can't be fully implemented
This commit is contained in:
parent
e8b5555630
commit
445e5def42
2 changed files with 0 additions and 107 deletions
|
@ -138,32 +138,3 @@ public:
|
|||
m_upgraded ? m_mutex.unlock() : m_mutex.unlock_shared();
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Safe reader lock. Can be recursive above other safe locks (reader or writer).
|
||||
class safe_reader_lock final
|
||||
{
|
||||
shared_mutex& m_mutex;
|
||||
bool m_is_owned;
|
||||
|
||||
public:
|
||||
safe_reader_lock(const safe_reader_lock&) = delete;
|
||||
|
||||
explicit safe_reader_lock(shared_mutex& mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
~safe_reader_lock();
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
// Safe writer lock. Can be recursive above other safe locks. Performs upgrade and degrade operations above existing reader lock if necessary.
|
||||
class safe_writer_lock final
|
||||
{
|
||||
shared_mutex& m_mutex;
|
||||
bool m_is_owned;
|
||||
bool m_is_upgraded;
|
||||
|
||||
public:
|
||||
safe_writer_lock(const safe_writer_lock&) = delete;
|
||||
|
||||
explicit safe_writer_lock(shared_mutex& mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
~safe_writer_lock();
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue